Field Notes

What a usable matching-funds letter actually contains

Hands reviewing a grant budget binder

Grant budgets often look complete until someone asks where the matching funds live. Letters that merely “support the project in spirit” rarely satisfy a funder’s financial desk. During our grant dossier reviews, we look for four concrete elements.

A named amount or in-kind description

“We will contribute NT$120,000 in cash” or “120 volunteer hours at the rate stated in Annex B” is usable. “We will assist as needed” is not.

Timing relative to the project period

State whether the match arrives at signing, mid-project, or as a reimbursable outlay. Ambiguous timing is a frequent findings-brief item.

Signatory authority

The letter should come from a person who can actually commit the funds or labour, on letterhead, with a date inside the call’s validity window.

Consistency with the budget table

If Annex B shows a 20% match and the letter implies 10%, the dossier contradicts itself. We advise applicants to update both documents in the same sitting.

None of this replaces the funder’s official guidance — it simply reduces the chance that a careful reader stops at page three.

← All field notes